American Academy of Periodontology Journal of Periodontology Online Welcome Guest
Sign in | Register
 
Abstract
2007, Vol. 78, No. 8, Pages 1477-1484 , DOI 10.1902/jop.2007.070001
(doi:10.1902/jop.2007.070001)

Histologic and Histomorphometric Evaluation of Alveolar Ridge Augmentation Using Bone Grafts and Titanium Micromesh in Humans

Giuseppe Corinaldesi,* Francesco Pieri,* Claudio Marchetti,* Milena Fini, Nicolò Nicoli Aldini, and Roberto Giardino

*Department of Odontostomatological Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.

†Department of Experimental Surgery, Research Institute Codivilla-Putti, Rizzoli Orthopedic Institute, University of Bologna.

Correspondence: Dr. Claudio Marchetti, Via San Vitale 59, 40139 Bologna, Italy. Fax: 39-051-225208; e-mail: .

Background: Recently, the use of titanium micromesh for alveolar bone augmentation has drawn interest; however, only limited histologic data are available on the quality of the bone regenerated. Therefore, this study compared the use of 100% intraoral autogenous bone to a combination of intraoral autogenous bone (70%) and bovine porous bone mineral (BPBM) (30%) for alveolar ridge augmentation with titanium micromesh histologically and histomorphometrically.

Methods: Twelve partially edentulous patients required alveolar bone augmentation before implant insertion because of ridge resorption. The defect sites, six in the maxilla and six in the mandible, were reconstructed with particulate autologous bone (control group, N = 6) or a mixture of autologous bone and BPBM (test group, N = 6) in combination with titanium micromesh. Core biopsies were taken from the defect sites 8 to 9 months after grafting at the time of implant insertion.

Results: Newly formed compact bone with a well-organized lamellar pattern was identified in all specimens. In the samples taken from the test group, the BPBM particles were surrounded completely by newly formed bone with no signs of resorption. The mean total bone volume was 62.38% ± 13.02% in the control group and 52.88% ± 11.47% in the test group. The soft tissue volume was 37.61% ± 13.02% and 29.96% ± 12.58%, respectively, and the residual BPBM volume was 17.15% ± 2.72% in the test group. No statistical difference was observed in the histologic parameters evaluated, irrespective of graft type and site (P >0.05).

Conclusion: Within the limits of this study, BPBM (30%) in combination with autogenous bone (70%) did not yield a lower percentage of new bone formed compared to autogenous bone alone in ridge augmentation with titanium micromesh.

KEYWORDS: Bone regeneration, clinical trials, dental implants, histology, titanium

Cited by

, , , , , . (2008) Alveolar Ridge Augmentation With Titanium Mesh and a Combination of Autogenous Bone and Anorganic Bovine Bone: A 2-Year Prospective Study. Journal of Periodontology 79:11, 2093-2103
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (1406 KB) | PDF Plus (659 KB) 
Full Text PDF (35,073.188 KB) PDF Plus (457.704 KB)
 

Previous Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (35073 KB)
View PDF Plus (458 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Giuseppe Corinaldesi
Francesco Pieri
Claudio Marchetti
Milena Fini
Nicolò Nicoli Aldini
Roberto Giardino
Keywords:
Bone regeneration
clinical trials
dental implants
histology
titanium

© 2009 American Academy of Periodontology. All rights reserved.
Disclaimers apply | Privacy commitment | Contact AAP
Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.