American Academy of Periodontology Journal of Periodontology Online Welcome Guest
Sign in | Register
 
Abstract
2007, Vol. 78, No. 6, Pages 991-996 , DOI 10.1902/jop.2007.060443
(doi:10.1902/jop.2007.060443)

Inter-Implant Bone Height Changes in Anterior Maxillary Immediate and Non-Immediate Adjacent Dental Implants

Irit Kupershmidt,* Liran Levin,* and Devorah Schwartz-Arad

*Department of Oral Rehabilitation, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.

†Unit of Periodontology, Department of Oral and Dental Sciences, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel.

‡Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University.

Correspondence: Dr. Devorah Schwartz-Arad, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Fax: 972-3-6409250; e-mail: .

Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate inter-implant bone crest height changes between immediate and non-immediate dental implants placed in the anterior maxillary region.

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on consecutively treated patients requiring at least two adjacent implants in the anterior maxillary region that were placed in the same operation during 1994 to 2004. Files of 45 healthy patients reporting 200 implants were reviewed. Age, gender, smoking status, and implant characteristics (coating and dimensions) were recorded. Inter-implant bone measurements were taken on two panoramic radiographs from each patient: one after implant placement and the other at the last follow-up. The distance between adjacent implants was measured at the implant–abutment interface (implant platform).

Results: Overall, 130 inter-implant gaps were found. Follow-up ranged from 8 to 146 months. Two-tailed Pearson correlation tests revealed a negative correlation between inter-implant distance and bone loss (P = 0.036). Mean peak-crest bone loss for immediate implants was higher than for delayed implants (P = 0.026). There was more bone loss when hydroxyapatite (HA)-coated implants were used, although no statistical significance was observed. No statistically significant difference was found between the different locations in the anterior maxilla. No correlation was found between patient's age, smoking habits, and bone loss or between follow-up time and bone loss.

Conclusions: A negative correlation was found between inter-implant distance and bone loss at the inter-implant bone crest in the anterior maxillary region. Bone loss was small in this study cohort.

KEYWORDS: Bone loss, dental implants, implantation, papilla

Cited by

, , , . (2008) Outcome Analysis of Immediately Placed, Immediately Restored Implants in the Esthetic Area: The Clinical Relevance of Different Interimplant Distances. Journal of Periodontology 79:6, 1056-1061
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (1230 KB) | PDF Plus (570 KB) 
Full Text PDF (8,248.858 KB) PDF Plus (299.735 KB)
 

Previous Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (8249 KB)
View PDF Plus (300 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Irit Kupershmidt
Liran Levin
Devorah Schwartz-Arad
Keywords:
Bone loss
dental implants
implantation
papilla

© 2009 American Academy of Periodontology. All rights reserved.
Disclaimers apply | Privacy commitment | Contact AAP
Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.