American Academy of Periodontology Journal of Periodontology Online Welcome Guest
Sign in | Register
 
Abstract
2006, Vol. 77, No. 2, Pages 203-210 , DOI 10.1902/jop.2006.040346
(doi:10.1902/jop.2006.040346)

Long-Term Evaluation of Hollow Screw and Hollow Cylinder Dental Implants: Clinical and Radiographic Results After 10 Years

Gerdien Telleman,* Henny J.A. Meijer, and Gerry M. Raghoebar

*Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

†Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Medical Center Groningen.

‡Department of Oral Function and Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental School, Faculty of Medical Sciences, University Medical Center Groningen.

Correspondence: Prof. H.J.A. Meijer, Department of Oral-Maxillofacial Surgery and Maxillofacial Prosthetics, University Medical Center Groningen, P.O. Box 30.001, 9700 RB Groningen, The Netherlands. Fax: 31-0-50-3611136; e-mail: .

Background: In 1988, an implant manufacturer offered a new dental implant system, with a wide choice of hollow cylinder (HC) and hollow screw (HS) implants. The purpose of this retrospective study of HS and HC implants was to evaluate clinical and radiographic parameters of peri-implant tissue and to analyze surgical and prosthetic aftercare.

Methods: A total of 89 HS and 26 HC implants in 38 edentulous patients were available for complete evaluation. The patients were treated with overdentures stabilized by two or four implants. The follow-up period was 10 years.

Results: The results of the clinical evaluation showed a mean sulcus probing depth of 3.3 ± 1.3 mm (range = 2 to 10 mm). The mean radiographic bone loss was 2.2 ± 2.1 mm (range = 0.1 to 12.2 mm). One implant (HS) was removed during the osseointegration period. Three other implants (two HS and one HC) in three patients had to be removed after 10 years. The survival rate of the HS implant (96.6%) was comparable to the HC implant (96.1%). The success rate of the HS implant (93.3%) was slightly more favorable compared to the HC implant (88.5%). The HS and HC implants met the Albrektsson criteria of success.

Conclusions: HS and HC implants provide a stable base for long-term support of a mandibular overdenture. Furthermore, it is important to monitor peri-implant bone level by taking annual radiographs and measuring probing depth, especially after prolonged service.

KEYWORDS: Aftercare, dental implants, long-term study, mouth, edentulous, overdenture

Cited by

, , , . (2009) Mandibular overdentures supported by two Brånemark, IMZ or ITI implants: a ten-year prospective randomized study. Journal of Clinical Periodontology
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009.
CrossRef
, , , , . (2008) Dual Path: A Concept to Improve the Esthetic Replacement of Missing Anterior Teeth with a Removable Partial Denture. Journal of Prosthodontics 17:7, 586-590
Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008.
CrossRef
, , . (2007) Supportive therapy and the longevity of dental implants: a systematic review of the literature. Clinical Oral Implants Research 18, 50-62
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2007.
CrossRef
, , , , . (2007) Impact of supportive periodontal therapy and implant surface roughness on implant outcome in patients with a history of periodontitis. Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 34:9, 805
CrossRef
, , , . (2006) A 2-Year Clinical Report of Patients Treated With Two Loading Protocols for Mandibular Overdentures: Early Versus Conventional Loading. Journal of Periodontology 77:12, 1998-2004
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006.
Abstract | Full Text | PDF (2357 KB) | PDF Plus (307 KB) 
Full Text PDF (87.892 KB) PDF Plus (181.675 KB)
 

Previous Article | Next Article
View/Print PDF (88 KB)
View PDF Plus (182 KB)
Add to favorites
Email to a friend
TOC Alert | Citation Alert What is RSS?

 
 
Quick Search
for 
Authors:
Gerdien Telleman
Henny J.A. Meijer
Gerry M. Raghoebar
Keywords:
Aftercare
dental implants
long-term study
mouth, edentulous
overdenture

© 2009 American Academy of Periodontology. All rights reserved.
Disclaimers apply | Privacy commitment | Contact AAP
Technology Partner - Atypon Systems, Inc.