|
Abstract
September 2005, Vol. 76, No. 9, Pages 1431-1435
, DOI 10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1431
(doi:10.1902/jop.2005.76.9.1431)
A Long-Term Study of Implants Supporting Overdentures as a Model for Implant Success Dr. Devorah Schwartz-AradDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. Nomi KidronDepartment of Prosthodontics, The Maurice and Gabriela Goldschleger School of Dental Medicine, Tel Aviv University. Eran Dolev Background: Implant-supported overdentures have been a common treatment for edentulous patients for the past 20 years, achieving good clinical results. The purpose of this study was to examine survival and success rates of implants supporting overdentures in the maxilla and mandible and to examine the influence of factors related to patients, implant procedure, implant data, and follow-up period on implant success. Methods: During a 10-year period (1990 to 2000), 285 implants were placed in 62 patients to support 69 overdentures (seven patients had overdentures in both jaws). Patients ranged in age from 45 to 85 years (mean 64.5 years). The files of 61 patients, including 277 implants supporting 68 overdentures (14 maxillary and 54 mandibular), had measurable radiographic post-exposure follow-up (range 6.63 to 110.93 months, mean 37.93 months) for cervical bone loss (CBL) measurements. Bone loss was measured by radiographic examination in which the mean number of exposed threads in mesial and distal sides of the implant was considered. Implants were rehabilitated by overdentures with bar (N = 52) or ball (N = 16) attachments. Results: Implant survival rate was 96.1% (11/285 did not survive) and total 10-year cumulative survival rate was 95.4% (maxilla, 83.5%, mandible, 99.5%). The success rate was 70.4% (maxilla, 41.9%; mandible, 80.8%) when using Albrektsson et al. success criteria. A logistic regression analysis showed that the maxilla (P <0.0001) and a short follow-up period (up to 5 years) (P = 0.017) were the most influencing factors enhancing CBL. Conclusions: 1) Survival of implants supporting overdentures was very high; 2) implants supporting overdentures in the maxilla had greater CBL than in the mandible; and 3) new criteria of implant success should be considered. J Periodontol 2005;76: 1431-1435. KEYWORDS: Bone loss/diagnosis , dental implants , dental implants, failure , denture, complete, lower , denture, complete, upper , denture, overlay , follow-up studies Cited byFrancesco Pieri, Nicolò Nicoli Aldini, Milena Fini, Claudio Marchetti, Giuseppe Corinaldesi. Immediate Functional Loading of Dental Implants Supporting a Bar-Retained Maxillary Overdenture: Preliminary 12-Month Results. Journal of Periodontology 0:0, 1-13 Abstract
| PDF (565 KB)
| PDF Plus (386 KB) A. Sanna, P. Nuytens, I. Naert, M. Quirynen. (2009) Successful outcome of splinted implants supporting a ‘planned’ maxillary overdenture: a retrospective evaluation and comparison with fixed full dental prostheses. Clinical Oral Implants Research 20:4, 406-413 Online publication date: 1-May-2009. CrossRef Peter Schleier, Gerrit Bierfreund, Stefan Schultze-Mosgau, Franziska Moldenhauer, Harald Küpper, Martin Freilich. (2008) Simultaneous dental implant placement and endoscope-guided internal sinus floor elevation: 2-year post-loading outcomes. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19:11, 1163-1170 Online publication date: 1-Dec-2008. CrossRef Lisa J. A. Heitz-Mayfield. (2008) Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35, 292-304 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. CrossRef Michael R. Markiewicz, Mauro Marincola, Luisa Arévalo Tovar, Joseph E. Margarone, Davis A. Garlapo, Sung-Kiang Chuang. (2008) Building on the Proceedings of the McGill Conference: Implant-Retained Overdentures in an Area of South America. Implant Dentistry 17:3, 288-298 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. CrossRef H. Schliephake, D. Scharnweber. (2008) Chemical and biological functionalization of titanium for dental implants. Journal of Materials Chemistry 18:21, 2404 Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008. CrossRef Cuneyt Karabuda, Mehmet Yaltrk, Mehmet Bayraktar. (2008) A Clinical Comparison of Prosthetic Complications of Implant-Supported Overdentures With Different Attachment Systems. Implant Dentistry 17:1, 74-81 Online publication date: 1-Feb-2008. CrossRef Moshik Tandlich, Jakob Ekstein, Pini Reisman, Lior Shapira. (2007) Removable Prostheses May Enhance Marginal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants: A Long-Term Retrospective Analysis. Journal of Periodontology 78:12, 2253-2259 Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (823 KB)
| PDF Plus (302 KB) Frank Peter Strietzel, Peter A. Reichart, Abhijit Kale, Milind Kulkarni, Brigitte Wegner, Ingeborg K?chler. (2007) Smoking interferes with the prognosis of dental implant treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal Of Clinical Periodontology 34:6, 523 CrossRef Ilser Turkyilmaz, Tolga F. Tözüm, Celal Tumer, Esma Nida Ozbek. (2006) A 2-Year Clinical Report of Patients Treated With Two Loading Protocols for Mandibular Overdentures: Early Versus Conventional Loading. Journal of Periodontology 77:12, 1998-2004 Online publication date: 1-Dec-2006. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (2357 KB)
| PDF Plus (307 KB) Liran Levin, Amir Laviv, Devorah Schwartz-Arad. (2006) Long-Term Success of Implants Replacing a Single Molar. Journal of Periodontology 77:9, 1528-1532 Online publication date: 1-Sep-2006. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (136 KB)
| PDF Plus (183 KB) Devorah Schwartz-Arad, Ran Herzberg, Liran Levin. (2005) Evaluation of Long-Term Implant Success. Journal of Periodontology 76:10, 1623-1628 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2005. Abstract
| PDF (378 KB)
| PDF Plus (206 KB)
|
|
|