|
Abstract
August 2005, Vol. 76, No. 8, Pages 1275-1281
, DOI 10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1275
(doi:10.1902/jop.2005.76.8.1275)
Comparative Study Between the Effects of Photodynamic Therapy and Conventional Therapy on Microbial Reduction in Ligature-Induced Peri-Implantitis in Dogs Ricardo R.A. HayekLaser and Applications Center, Institute of Nuclear and Energetic Research, São Paulo, Brazil. Ney S. AraújoDepartment of Pathology, School of Dentistry, University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil. Marco A. GiosoDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, University of São Paulo. Jonathan FerreiraDepartment of Surgery, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine and Zootechnics, University of São Paulo. Carlos A. Baptista-SobrinhoBrazilian Army, Osasco, São Paulo, Brazil. Aécio M. Yamada Jr.Laser and Applications Center, Institute of Nuclear and Energetic Research, São Paulo, Brazil. Dr. Martha S. RibeiroLaser and Applications Center, Institute of Nuclear and Energetic Research, São Paulo, Brazil. Background: Progressive peri-implant bone losses, which are accompanied by inflammatory lesions in the soft tissues, are referred to as peri-implantitis. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of photodynamic therapy (PDT) and conventional technique on microbial reduction in ligature-induced peri-implantitis in dogs. Methods: Eighteen third premolars from nine Labrador retriever dogs were extracted and the implants were submerged. After osseointegration, peri-implantitis was induced. After 4 months, ligature was removed and natural bacterial plaque was allowed to form for another 4 months. The animals were then randomly divided into two groups. In the conventional group, they were treated using mucoperiosteal flaps for scaling the implant surface and chlorexidine (conventional) irrigation. In the PDT group, only mucoperiosteal scaling was carried out before photodynamic therapy. Inside the peri-implant pocket, a paste-based azulene photosensitizer was placed and then a GaAlAs low-power laser (λ = 660 nm, P = 40 mW, E = 7.2 J for 3 minutes) was used. Microbiological samples were obtained before and immediately after treatment. Before treatment, one implant was removed and analyzed by scanning electron microscopy to validate the contamination. Results: The results of this study showed that Prevotella sp., Fusobacterium sp., and S. Beta-haemolyticus were significantly reduced for both groups. After treatment, no significant differences were observed between the groups. Conclusion: These findings suggest that photodynamic therapy is a non-invasive method that could be used to reduce microorganisms in peri-implantitis. J Periodontol 2005;76:1275-1281. KEYWORDS: Animal studies , bacteria/growth , peri-implant diseases/prevention and control , peri-implant diseases/microbiology , phototherapy Cited byMartina Lulic, Isabelle Leiggener Görög, Giovanni E. Salvi, Christoph A. Ramseier, Nikolaos Mattheos, Niklaus P. Lang. (2009) One-year outcomes of repeated adjunctive photodynamic therapy during periodontal maintenance: a proof-of-principle randomized-controlled clinical trial. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 36:8, 661-666 Online publication date: 1-Sep-2009. CrossRef Isao Ishikawa, Akira Aoki, Aristeo A. Takasaki, Koji Mizutani, Katia M. Sasaki, Yuichi Izumi. (2009) Application of lasers in periodontics: true innovation or myth?. Periodontology 2000 50:1, 90-126 Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009. CrossRef Juliano Milanezi de Almeida, Leticia Helena Theodoro, Alvaro Francisco Bosco, Maria José Hitomi Nagata, Samara Bonfante, Valdir Gouveia Garcia. (2008) Treatment of Experimental Periodontal Disease by Photodynamic Therapy in Rats With Diabetes. Journal of Periodontology 79:11, 2156-2165 Online publication date: 1-Nov-2008. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (2857 KB)
| PDF Plus (891 KB) Noel Claffey, Emily Clarke, Ioannis Polyzois, Stefan Renvert. (2008) Surgical treatment of peri-implantitis. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35, 316-332 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. CrossRef Stefan Renvert, Ann-Marie Roos-Jansåker, Noel Claffey. (2008) Non-surgical treatment of peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis: a literature review. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35, 305-315 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. CrossRef Panos Chondros, Dimitris Nikolidakis, Nicos Christodoulides, Ralf Rössler, Norbert Gutknecht, Anton Sculean. (2008) Photodynamic therapy as adjunct to non-surgical periodontal treatment in patients on periodontal maintenance: a randomized controlled clinical trial. Lasers in Medical Science Online publication date: 9-Jun-2008. CrossRef Juliano Milanezi de Almeida, Leticia Helena Theodoro, Alvaro Francisco Bosco, Maria José Hitomi Nagata, Marie Oshiiwa, Valdir Gouveia Garcia. (2008) In Vivo Effect of Photodynamic Therapy on Periodontal Bone Loss in Dental Furcations. Journal of Periodontology 79:6, 1081-1088 Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (1914 KB)
| PDF Plus (768 KB) Y. L. Qin, X. L. Luan, L. J. Bi, Y. Q. Sheng, C. N. Zhou, Z. G. Zhang. (2008) Comparison of toluidine blue-mediated photodynamic therapy and conventional scaling treatment for periodontitis in rats. Journal of Periodontal Research 43:2, 162-167 Online publication date: 1-May-2008. CrossRef Juliano Milanezi de Almeida, Leticia Helena Theodoro, Alvaro Francisco Bosco, Maria José Hitomi Nagata, Marie Oshiiwa, Valdir Gouveia Garcia. (2007) Influence of Photodynamic Therapy on the Development of Ligature-Induced Periodontitis in Rats. Journal of Periodontology 78:3, 566-575 Online publication date: 1-Mar-2007. Abstract
| Full Text
| PDF (25255 KB)
| PDF Plus (558 KB) Aguinaldo S. Garcez, Martha S. Ribeiro, George P. Tegos, Silvia C. Núñez, Antonio O.C. Jorge, Michael R. Hamblin. (2007) Antimicrobial photodynamic therapy combined with conventional endodontic treatment to eliminate root canal biofilm infection. Lasers in Surgery and Medicine 39:1, 59 CrossRef
|
|
|