|
Abstract
May 2005, Vol. 76, No. 5, Pages 791-802
, DOI 10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.791
(doi:10.1902/jop.2005.76.5.791)
Crestal Bone Changes Around Titanium Implants. Part I: A Retrospective Radiographic Evaluation in Humans Comparing Two Non-Submerged Implant Designs With Different Machined Collar Lengths Michael P. HänggiDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, University of Basel Dental School, Basel, Switzerland. Private Practice, Basel, Switzerland. Daniel C. HänggiPrivate Practice, Basel, Switzerland. John D. SchoolfieldData Analysis & Management, Academic Informatics Services, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, TX. Jürg MeyerDepartment of Preventive Dentistry and Oral Microbiology, University of Basel Dental School, Basel, Switzerland. David L. CochranDepartment of Periodontics, Dental School, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Dr. Joachim S. HermannDepartment of Periodontics, Dental School, University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio. Division of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Continuing Education Center, German Dental Association, Stuttgart, Germany. Background: Experimental studies demonstrated that peri-implant crestal hard and soft tissues are significantly influenced in their apico-coronal position by the rough/smooth implant border as well as the microgap/ interface between implant and abutment/restoration. The aim of this study was to evaluate radiographically the crestal bone level changes around two types of implants, one with a 2.8 mm smooth machined coronal length and the other with 1.8 mm collar. Methods: In 68 patients, a total of 201 non-submerged titanium implants (101 with a 1.8 mm, 100 with a 2.8 mm long smooth coronal collar) were placed with their rough/smooth implant border at the bone crest level. From the day of surgery up until 3 years after implant placement crestal bone levels were analyzed digitally using standardized radiographs. Results: Bone remodeling was most pronounced during the unloaded, initial healing phase and did not significantly differ between the two types of implants over the entire observation period (P >0.20). Crestal bone loss for implants placed in patients with poor oral hygiene was significantly higher than in patients with adequate or good plaque control (P <0.005). Furthermore, a tendency for additional crestal bone loss was detected in the group of patients who had been diagnosed with aggressive periodontitis prior to implant placement (P = 0.058). In both types of implants, sand-blasted, large grit, acid-etched (SLA) surfaced implants tended to have slightly less crestal bone loss compared to titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) surfaced implants, but the difference was not significant (P >0.30). Conclusion: The implant design with the shorter smooth coronal collar had no additional bone loss and may help to reduce the risk of an exposed metal implant margin in areas of esthetic concern. J Periodontol 2005;76:791-802. KEYWORDS: Aggressive periodontitis , bone loss/prevention and control , bone remodeling , chronic periodontitis , comparative retrospective study , comparison studies , crestal bone changes , dental implants , follow-up studies , human studies , long-term data , non-submerged implants , oral hygiene , periodontitis , radiography Cited byRodrigo Edson Santos Barbosa, Cássio do Nascimento, João Paulo Mardegan Issa, Evandro Watanabe, Izabel Yoko Ito, Rubens Ferreira de Albuquerque Junior. (2009) Bacterial Culture and DNA Checkerboard for the Detection of Internal Contamination in Dental Implants. Journal of Prosthodontics 18:5, 376-381 Online publication date: 1-Aug-2009. CrossRef Senay Canay, Kvanç Akça. (2009) Biomechanical Aspects of Bone-Level Diameter Shifting at Implant-Abutment Interface. Implant Dentistry 18:3, 239-248 Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009. CrossRef Emanuel A. Bratu, Moshik Tandlich, Lior Shapira. (2009) A rough surface implant neck with microthreads reduces the amount of marginal bone loss: a prospective clinical study. Clinical Oral Implants Research Online publication date: 1-Jul-2009. CrossRef Hans-Joachim Nickenig, Manfred Wichmann, Karl Andreas Schlegel, Emeka Nkenke, Stephan Eitner. (2009) Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs. Clinical Oral Implants Research Online publication date: 1-Mar-2009. CrossRef Lisa J. A. Heitz-Mayfield. (2008) Peri-implant diseases: diagnosis and risk indicators. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35, 292-304 Online publication date: 1-Oct-2008. CrossRef LJA Heitz-Mayfield. (2008) Diagnosis and management of peri-implant diseases. Australian Dental Journal 53:s1, S43-S48 Online publication date: 1-Jul-2008. CrossRef Kerstin Fischer, Torsten Stenberg, Måns Hedin, Lars Sennerby. (2008) Five-year results from a randomized, controlled trial on early and delayed loading of implants supporting full-arch prosthesis in the edentulous maxilla. Clinical Oral Implants Research 19:5, 433-441 Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008. CrossRef Constantine T. T. Ong, Saso Ivanovski, Ian G. Needleman, Maria Retzepi, David R. Moles, Maurizio S. Tonetti, Nikolaos Donos. (2008) Systematic review of implant outcomes in treated periodontitis subjects. Journal of Clinical Periodontology 35:5, 438-462 Online publication date: 1-Jun-2008. CrossRef Christopher D. J. Evans, Stephen T. Chen. (2007) Esthetic outcomes of immediate implant placements. Clinical Oral Implants Research 0:0, 071025001541009 CrossRef
|
|
|