|
Abstract
April 2005, Vol. 76, No. 4, Pages 614-620
, DOI 10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.614
(doi:10.1902/jop.2005.76.4.614)
Modulating the Effects of Diabetes on Osseointegration With Aminoguanidine and Doxycycline Jeffrey A. KopmanPrivate practice, Huntington, NY; formerly Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine, Boston, MA. David M. KimDepartment of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine. Suraiya S. RahmanPeriodontics, Loma Linda University, School of Dentistry, Loma Linda, CA; formerly Department of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine. Jason A. ArandiaPrivate practice, Boston, MA; previously, Harvard School of Dental Medicine. Nadeem Y. KarimbuxDepartment of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine. Dr. Joseph P. FiorelliniDepartment of Oral Medicine, Infection and Immunity, Harvard School of Dental Medicine. Background: The current knowledge of wound healing around implant surfaces is quite limited, particularly as it relates to the effects of systemic diseases such as diabetes. The purpose of our research is to histologically evaluate the effects of aminoguanidine and doxycycline in the modification of peri-implant wound healing around endosseous implants in diabetic rats. Methods: Thirty-two Sprague-Dawley rats were randomly assigned to four different treatment groups. One group served as the non-diabetic control, while diabetes was induced in other groups. Titanium plasma-sprayed (TPS) implants were placed in the femora of each animal 2 weeks following diabetic induction. One group of diabetic rats was given aminoguanidine via intraperitoneal injection, and another given doxycycline via oral gavage for 28 days beginning on the day of implantation. The third group of diabetic rats received no medication (controls). All animals were sacrificed following 28 days of healing. Results: The results were measured by marrow bone-toimplant contact (MBIC) between the groups. Values for MBIC were greater for the non-diabetic control group than the diabetic control group (P <0.001). Aminoguanidine-treated diabetic animals had a significantly greater MBIC than the diabetic control group (P <0.01). Diabetic animals receiving doxycycline did not differ significantly from the diabetic control group (P >0.05). Conclusions: The results of this study using a rat model con- firm previous reports that diabetes inhibits osseointegration, as defined by MBIC. In addition, this study demonstrates that the detrimental effects of diabetes on osseointegration can be modified using aminoguanidine systemically. However, systemic administration of doxycycline only slightly enhances osseointegration. J Periodontol 2005;76:614-620. KEYWORDS: Aminoguanidine/therapeutic use , animal studies , dental implants , diabetes mellitus , doxycycline/therapeutic use , osseointegration , wound healing
|
|
|